A Serious Debate
Forum rules
1. No porn or illegal stuff. No links to porn without a NSFW mark
2. Don’t derail threads
3. No post on this board grants any right to feel offended. Behaving like a douchebag will get you banned though, try to keep it civilized
4. No quote pyramids
5. Absolutely no reddit/9gag/funnyjunk crap
6. No dox
7. No debating over politics and religion. All that results is butthurt and ego-stroking.
1. No porn or illegal stuff. No links to porn without a NSFW mark
2. Don’t derail threads
3. No post on this board grants any right to feel offended. Behaving like a douchebag will get you banned though, try to keep it civilized
4. No quote pyramids
5. Absolutely no reddit/9gag/funnyjunk crap
6. No dox
7. No debating over politics and religion. All that results is butthurt and ego-stroking.
A Serious Debate
So, how much wood WOULD a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

You know you love me.
Re: A Serious Debate
The real question is: How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck norris?

- kosherbacon
- Writer
- Posts: 857
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 5:00 am
- Location: /k/alifornia
- Contact:
-
jarek56
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:35 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the hills of Washington...
Re: A Serious Debate
You know, kosher, the fact that you had that answer ready made for just such an occasion leaves me so vaguely confused and utterly impressed that I am going to do Lena's route FIRST in the VN just because of that alone, and because I secretly have crushed upon you. And then, I'm going to rip my eyes out of my head with an egg beater because I'm certain that brain bleach just won't be enough, and have my vocal cords donated to SCIENCE so as to discover why exactly I EVER said any of this.kosherbacon wrote:Two and a half cords per season.
I vote that such a wood chuck, IF a would chuck could, in fact, Chuck Norris, that approximately 73% of the trees in Siberia would instanly disintegrate.
- Al Capwned
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:00 am
- Location: Hiding in the space between seconds
Re: A Serious Debate
It is quite simple really. Humans chuck wood at a 90 degree angle resulting in a 30 degree parabolic arc, this arc is inversely proportional to the mass of the human versus the mass of the wood being chucked. This results an optimal wood chucking speed. Woodchucks chuck wood at an aproximately 24.67839 degree angle, which by the way is a very difficult angle to chuck wood, resulting in two different arcs, one of 84.987 degrees and another at 5.3428373909 degrees. This inefficient way of chucking wood means woodchucks chuck 98.546% less wood than your standard human male.analane wrote:So, how much wood WOULD a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
tl;dr
woodchucks can't chuck very much wood
my only real contribution to this forum,Comedies&Tragedies, you should read it sometime(maybe).
Re: A Serious Debate
Well, if a woodchuck COULD, indeed, chuck Norris, he (or she, I am all for gender equality) would immediately be lauded on the internet for its Norris-chucking abilities. Said woodchuck would be placed in high esteem, even above the alleged Norris, and thusly would have many jokes made about its abilities until years later, when someone realizes that everyone's just beating a dead horse, or in this case, a dead woodchuck, as the woodchuck (marmota morax) can only live an average of two to three years in the wild.

You know you love me.
-
jarek56
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:35 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the hills of Washington...
Re: A Serious Debate
A fine point, sir or ma'am. (Honestly, I can't tell gender for shit these days on the inter-webs) My only contesting point is how long does a woodchuck actually capable of chucking Chuck Norris have to live, and how much longer could such a wood chuck's lifespan be extended in captivity barring the usage of a deathnote, immortality drug, or questionable religious ceremony?analane wrote:Well, if a woodchuck COULD, indeed, chuck Norris, he (or she, I am all for gender equality) would immediately be lauded on the internet for its Norris-chucking abilities. Said woodchuck would be placed in high esteem, even above the alleged Norris, and thusly would have many jokes made about its abilities until years later, when someone realizes that everyone's just beating a dead horse, or in this case, a dead woodchuck, as the woodchuck (marmota morax) can only live an average of two to three years in the wild.
Re: A Serious Debate
Ma'am, thank you 
And with proper care of your pet groundhog or woodchuck, it can (in captivity) live anywhere from 9-14 years. However, if your woodchuck is approved for human vaccine testing, it will be infected with Woodchuck Hepatitis B, thus guaranteeing liver cancer, which I believe "wood" cut his or her lifespan short.
And with proper care of your pet groundhog or woodchuck, it can (in captivity) live anywhere from 9-14 years. However, if your woodchuck is approved for human vaccine testing, it will be infected with Woodchuck Hepatitis B, thus guaranteeing liver cancer, which I believe "wood" cut his or her lifespan short.

You know you love me.
-
jarek56
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:35 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the hills of Washington...
Re: A Serious Debate
A most...unexpectedly fascinating bit of information.
You know of groundhog life-span from personal experience, I take it?
I couldn't care a WHIT what gender you are!!
As for your...vaccination pun...best not to...like even APPROACH that...
I couldn't care a WHIT what gender you are!!
As for your...vaccination pun...best not to...like even APPROACH that...
Re: A Serious Debate
No, I know it from educational websites, sadly, but I WISH I knew from experience. That'd be cool.

You know you love me.
- scopedknife
- Composer
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:00 am
- Location: UK
-
TheLastMelody
- Posts: 848
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 5:00 am
- Location: The Binary Field of Ar Tonelico
Re: A Serious Debate
^ = Winscopedknife wrote:Heheh... wood...
The Last Melody wrote:The past doesn't forgive, it only teaches.
Terra of the Left, God's Right Seat wrote:Challenge me to your hearts content, then give up to your hearts content
Zezin wrote:...I'm a derp, I know.
- Super Läzuli
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:02 am
Re: A Serious Debate
There's an actual answer to this question:
a woodchuck would chuck all the wood a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
a woodchuck would chuck all the wood a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
space invaders:
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠ
ൠ
||
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠ
ൠ
||
-
jarek56
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:35 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the hills of Washington...
Re: A Serious Debate
BUT HOW MUCH WOOD IS THAT??!?!?!?!Super Läzuli wrote:There's an actual answer to this question:
a woodchuck would chuck all the wood a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
- Super Läzuli
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:02 am
Re: A Serious Debate
Sure is, George.
space invaders:
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠ
ൠ
||
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠ
ൠ
||
-
jarek56
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:35 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the hills of Washington...
Re: A Serious Debate
*fails to understand the reference*Super Läzuli wrote:Sure is, George.
- Super Läzuli
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:02 am
Re: A Serious Debate
Son you needs to watch your Droopy Dog.
More seriously though that's not exactly how it's said in the original anyway so no probz. It's just something I say (also: "Sure am, Eddy")
More seriously though that's not exactly how it's said in the original anyway so no probz. It's just something I say (also: "Sure am, Eddy")
space invaders:
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠ
ൠ
||
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠ
ൠ
||
-
jarek56
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:35 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the hills of Washington...
Re: A Serious Debate
To this, sir, I merely reply "GREETINGS, I AM ED! Bringer of Bacon."Super Läzuli wrote:(also: "Sure am, Eddy")
- Super Läzuli
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:02 am
Re: A Serious Debate
What can you do when you live in a shoe and you ain't got no soul?
space invaders:
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠ
ൠ
||
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠൠ
ൠ
ൠ
||
Re: A Serious Debate
Write a Delta blues song about it. I think I'm going to do that now.Super Läzuli wrote:What can you do when you live in a shoe and you ain't got no soul?
Over the wintry
forest, winds howl in rage
with no leaves to blow.
-Soseki
My Fanfics:
Absolut SchöneWill be updated (fairly) regularly(Lies)
Broken Glass Currently on Hiatus.
forest, winds howl in rage
with no leaves to blow.
-Soseki
My Fanfics:
Absolut Schöne
Broken Glass Currently on Hiatus.