New Blog Post: Never Stick it in Crazy

[whiic]

rape

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIgFbqRngjA

Come on! That's not rape enough. Not even close.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDGHei6Nllk
10 rapes per second or nothing.

[Al Capwned]

rape

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIgFbqRngjA

[TheLastMelody]

rape

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIgFbqRngjA

Count on Kosher for doing something like this, every time (almost)

[scopedknife]

rape

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIgFbqRngjA

Heh

and lol@ dat comment from Robert Northrop

[Zezin]

The only thing I ever had against the idea of sex scenes, was I remember there being cameras in the dorm rooms back at Hawthorne.
I don't think anyone will have sex in front of a camera unless they are doing a porno.

[scopedknife]

The only thing I ever had against the idea of sex scenes, was I remember there being cameras in the dorm rooms back at Hawthorne.
I don't think anyone will have sex in front of a camera unless they are doing a porno.

One word, my friend: exhibitionism.

[Zezin]

The only thing I ever had against the idea of sex scenes, was I remember there being cameras in the dorm rooms back at Hawthorne.
I don't think anyone will have sex in front of a camera unless they are doing a porno.

One word, my friend: exhibitionism.

And off go my sides.

[jumjummju]

Well, I just hope whatever sex in this VN is gonna be handled more realistically, like KS did, rather than they doing it perfectly on their first try.

Then again, what am I saying about sex being realistic when I've never even kissed a female much less went all the way. For all I know ear-sex is the common way to start, and foreplay consists of headbutting other primal males in a show of dominance.

[TheLastMelody]

Well, I just hope whatever sex in this VN is gonna be handled more realistically, like KS did, rather than they doing it perfectly on their first try.

Then again, what am I saying about sex being realistic when I've never even kissed a female much less went all the way. For all I know ear-sex is the common way to start, and foreplay consists of headbutting other primal males in a show of dominance.

I think you just taught me something new, must note down everything.

[Waytfm]

Well, I just hope whatever sex in this VN is gonna be handled more realistically, like KS did, rather than they doing it perfectly on their first try

Part of me agrees with you, and the other part of me goes: "Do I really want to see an H-scene where he awkwardly puts a condom on for a solid minute, and then the sex is over in half the time? I think not."

[kosherbacon]

Well, I just hope whatever sex in this VN is gonna be handled more realistically, like KS did, rather than they doing it perfectly on their first try.

Then again, what am I saying about sex being realistic when I've never even kissed a female much less went all the way. For all I know ear-sex is the common way to start, and foreplay consists of headbutting other primal males in a show of dominance.

So what you mean is you want virgin sex to be handled realistically. Yeah, we'll try to pull that off, but only when the characters involved actually are virgins.

[jumjummju]

Well, I just hope whatever sex in this VN is gonna be handled more realistically, like KS did, rather than they doing it perfectly on their first try.

Then again, what am I saying about sex being realistic when I've never even kissed a female much less went all the way. For all I know ear-sex is the common way to start, and foreplay consists of headbutting other primal males in a show of dominance.

So what you mean is you want virgin sex to be handled realistically. Yeah, we'll try to pull that off, but only when the characters involved actually are virgins.

Uh, yeah, I guess. I just always thought that sex with someone new was almost always awkward but, then again, I have no authority on the subject. Maybe non-virginal sex consists entirely of kissing the other person, just as long as they don't do it so much so that they get pregnant.

Well, I just hope whatever sex in this VN is gonna be handled more realistically, like KS did, rather than they doing it perfectly on their first try

Part of me agrees with you, and the other part of me goes: "Do I really want to see an H-scene where he awkwardly puts a condom on for a solid minute, and then the sex is over in half the time? I think not."

Screw the condom (pun unintended), we're teenagers; future us be damned, present us is having awkward sex. And is doing it in the wrong hole because present us is just that bad.

[Ravenous]

Perhaps it wasn't a good idea to write a blog post and make a thread about sex. It appears the community wasn't ready yet.

[TheLastMelody]

Perhaps it wasn't a good idea to write a blog post and make a thread about sex. It appears the community wasn't ready yet.

Hitting the hammer with the nail, eh?

[whiic]

Well, I just hope whatever sex in this VN is gonna be handled more realistically, like KS did, rather than they doing it perfectly on their first try

Part of me agrees with you, and the other part of me goes: "Do I really want to see an H-scene where he awkwardly puts a condom on for a solid minute, and then the sex is over in half the time? I think not."

If I want cartoon porn, I go to Gelbooru.

VN should have awkward sex, condoms, accidental anal, premature ejaculation and unintended teen pregnancy.

[jumjummju]

Well, I just hope whatever sex in this VN is gonna be handled more realistically, like KS did, rather than they doing it perfectly on their first try

Part of me agrees with you, and the other part of me goes: "Do I really want to see an H-scene where he awkwardly puts a condom on for a solid minute, and then the sex is over in half the time? I think not."

If I want cartoon porn, I go to Gelbooru.

VN should have awkward sex, condoms, accidental anal, premature ejaculation and unintended teen pregnancy.

All in glorious detail.

Perhaps it wasn't a good idea to write a blog post and make a thread about sex. It appears the community wasn't ready yet.

Oi! I'm 15! I'm trying my best to be mature, it's just that I suck at it.

[Snuffkin]

I'm happy it won't contain rape

All heterosexual sex in a patriarchal society is rape. If Eric is a male and has sex, he commits rape because women in a rape culture cannot truly consent due to gendered violence and the concept of Schrödinger's rapist which makes everyone with a penis guilty of using the rape culture to it's advantage even if personally doesn't use violence. It is the lack of consent created by fear that creates rape.

Therefore Eric is a reverse trap who's just clothes as a male... or a voyer peeking but not partaking in hot lesbian action. Obviously not masturbating to it or even being aroused by it, because pornography is also rape and so are lascivious glances.

...or alternatively, there will be rape in the VN and the promise of not containing it is a lie (rape is the new cake). I hope there will be rape. No VN is good without rape. I like rape. (But I dislike rape rape.)

Don't blame me for trivializing rape. Feminists did it, I'm just poking fun at them - not the rape victims. And I mean, rape rape victims now.

Oh sweet lord, this reminds me of the time I tried posting on A+. It's amazing how many hardcore feminists actually MAKE me feel misogynistic.

And yeah, it IS ridiculous to talk as if feminism is a homogenous movement, but you've got to remember that what gets the most attention out of any variation in it happens to be a lot closer to man-hating than good ol' humanists equality.

[whiic]

[clipping some quote pyramid to save space]
Oh sweet lord, this reminds me of the time I tried posting on A+. It's amazing how many hardcore feminists actually MAKE me feel misogynistic.

And yeah, it IS ridiculous to talk as if feminism is a homogenous movement, but you've got to remeber that what gets the most attention out of any variation in it happens to be a lot closer to man-hating than hood ol' humanists equality.

There indeed is very much difference between variants of feminists. So much, in fact, that even using word "feminist" to describe them all isn't even descriptive because if you use a top level "feminism" that includes multiple variants of itself under it, you need to have some common basis. With feminism, you have very little.

For example men's liberation movement doesn't much want to be equated to conservative men movement ...or social conservatives in general since many women also widely support conservative values (women benefit from conservative values: protection, money, free time, chivalry, etc.)
This is however less apparent with feminists, where female supremacists co-exist with liberal feminists under the same umbrella definition of "feminism". Some liberal feminists try to make a difference... others consider word "feminism" tainted beyond hope, or just feel repulsed by the female supremacists calling old school liberal feminists as "gender traitors", "female Chauvinists", etc., for not pushing for women first agendas but stick to juridical equity, and therefore choose to not be labeled a "feminist" but rather just a "supported of equity". Also: "feminism" is a gender-loaded word so while it originally was a women's liberation movement, nowadays it pretty much implies supporting of gender superiority.

(Men however are yet to be liberated from stuff like men-only force conscription. They are also more bound to sexual stereotypes than women are.)

[Snuffkin]

"feminism" is a gender-loaded word so while it originally was a women's liberation movement, nowadays it pretty much implies supporting of gender superiority.

(Men however are yet to be liberated from stuff like men-only force conscription. They are also more bound to sexual stereotypes than women are.)

Much like how within a few decades of the 20th century communism went from being supportive of worker's seizure of industrial infrastructure, the rerouting of societal resources to distribute necessary services and participation in what amounted to a direct democracy or something similar to a Greek forum to... something comparable to fascism.

The conscription bit DOES make sense to me from an anatomical perspective, but then again almost everyone in society isn't conditioned to the point they would've had to have been to be conscripted in the old days, so I'm sure there are a good deal of woman who could be better soldiers off the bat than their testicle-swinging peers.

[whiic]

The conscription bit DOES make sense to me from an anatomical perspective, but then again almost everyone in society isn't conditioned to the point they would've had to have been to be conscripted in the old days, so I'm sure there are a good deal of woman who could be better soldiers off the bat than their testicle-swinging peers.

While men are statistically stronger, it doesn't lead to unpaid, forced conscription service as a rational conclusion. It could also be replaced with:
- governmental army based on adequately paid volunteers (introducing adequate wages to attract volunteers)
- private mercenary armies based on paid volunteers
- private militia based on unpaid volunteers (most likely fit only as basic grunts as special forces training would be limited to paid personnel)
... or ANY combination of the above.

All those alternatives would be... you know... voluntary. It doesn't have to be gender limited as men would probably want to participate more than women even if women weren't prohibited from participating. People themselves often know if they're physically fit for it.

___

Unpaid slave labour is an equity issue not to be justified by anatomy.

For example men's incapability to make babies could under conservative logic be used to force women to pregnancy (to eliminate the threat of Islamization for example, or a so called pension bomb resulting from pension insurance bubble that has plagued Finland for decades). Or to prohibit abortion of a fetus based on the same logic.

Anatomy could also be used to justify other types of slave labour for women. If men need to have 1 year of military training (even at peace time) because they are (on average) anatomically more capable for it, why not force women to work into a brothel without a pay? Women are anatomically more capable to attract customers as most customers to brothels are males and most males are heterosexual. If it feels discriminatory that males get hookers for free, you could make the government controlled slave-work brothels to be not-free-of-charge and that money be collected like taxes (but not handed over to the hookers (i.e the entire female population of the country)). And it would be... like... "equality"... in a perverted and twisted way of distributing suffering equally rather than aiming at eliminating it. You know: socialism. Even distribution of pain and suffering.